Support Triage Demo
Turn a messy support inbox into a readable workflow.
See how SolveLang maps incoming support emails into clear ownership, priority, reply drafts, and next steps — before you wire up production automation.
Or copy: hello@solve-lang.com
Incoming Support Email
Urgent billing issue
From: ops@acme-labs.com
We were charged twice and need this fixed before renewal. Can someone from your team review today?
Topic
billing
Urgency
urgent
Owner
finance_operations
Queue
billing
Status
needs-human-review
Before
Support work depends on memory and interruption.
- Shared inbox
- Manual triage
- Slack scrambling
- Unclear ownership
- Customers waiting
After
The rules are visible before anything runs unattended.
- Classified topic
- Priority selected
- Owner assigned
- Reply drafted
- Task or alert created
- Human review preserved
Workflow Map
The support triage path becomes inspectable.
Each step can be discussed with the operator who owns the process before the workflow is connected to live tools.
Step 1
Customer email arrives
Next →
Step 2
Extract subject/body
Next →
Step 3
Classify topic
Next →
Step 4
Estimate urgency
Next →
Step 5
Assign owner
Next →
Step 6
Draft reply
Next →
Step 7
Create task
Next →
Step 8
Alert if urgent
Next →
Step 9
Human review
SolveLang-Style Script
A workflow draft operators can read.
This is a readable workflow draft, not a claim that every integration is wired today. The point is to make the trigger, routing rules, outputs, and human review point explicit first.
workflow "support_triage_demo" on email.received where inbox == "support@acme.com" extract customer_email subject body received_at classify topic using ["billing", "bug", "onboarding", "account", "general"] classify urgency using ["normal", "high", "urgent"] when topic == "billing" set owner = "finance_operations" set queue = "billing" draft reply = "Thanks — we received your billing request and a finance specialist is reviewing it." create task in "billing_queue" when topic == "bug" set owner = "product_support" set queue = "bug_triage" draft reply = "Thanks — we received your report and are validating the issue now." create task in "bug_queue" when topic == "onboarding" set owner = "customer_success" set queue = "onboarding_help" draft reply = "Thanks — we received your onboarding question and will guide you through the next step." create task in "success_queue" otherwise set owner = "support_generalist" set queue = "general_support" draft reply = "Thanks — we received your request and will reply shortly." create task in "support_queue" when urgency == "urgent" notify slack "#support-escalations" mark status = "needs-human-review" otherwise mark status = "queued" output customer_email topic urgency owner queue status reply
Example Outputs
The result is clear enough to review.
Customer
acme-labs.com
Topic
billing
Urgency
urgent
Owner
finance_operations
Queue
billing
Status
needs-human-review
Reply draft
Thanks — we received your billing request and a finance specialist is reviewing it.
Slack alert
#support-escalations
Task
created in billing_queue
Why This Matters
Rules should not live only in someone's head.
Most teams already have these rules in someone's head. SolveLang makes the workflow explicit before implementation.
Unclear ownership
Support requests stop bouncing between people because the owner rule is written down.
Manual triage
The first read becomes a structured decision instead of a repeated judgment call.
Duplicated reading
Everyone can see why the request was routed instead of re-reading the whole thread.
Missed follow-ups
The workflow names the next task, queue, and review point before the customer waits too long.
Human review for risky cases
Urgent or sensitive cases are flagged for a person instead of being treated as fully automatic.
Workflow Audit
Want this for one of your workflows?
Send one messy process. We'll map the trigger, decisions, outputs, human review points, and automation path.
Or copy: hello@solve-lang.com